Thursday, June 27, 2013

British muslims persecuted? You've got to be kidding me.

Around 10,000 white girls are raped by muslim gangs in the UK, and there's no outright protest. As always, it's the muslims who are the victims. So, let's just give the swine tips on protecting themselves. How about jailing the lot of them. Sounds good to me.




How can British Muslim communities better protect themselves?

The Guardian

British Jews have a long history of experiencing state-sponsored persecution, violence and expulsion that is more extreme than the contemporary situation facing Muslims in Britain. Nevertheless, Muslims can learn important lessons from the extensive�...



Monday, November 19, 2012

Hamas' Claims: True or False? • IDF Blog | The Official Blog of the Israel Defense Forces

Hamas' Claims: True or False? • IDF Blog | The Official Blog of the Israel Defense Forces

Fries the mind when you think of how many people actually believe this shtus.  Even more, when you think of what they do to Israel on a daily basis.  No one cares.  It's about as illogical as it gets.

Monday, November 12, 2012

Rocket Attacks on Israel From Gaza • IDF Blog | The Official Blog of the Israel Defense Forces

So many people lately have been posting pics of Communista Rice on facebook because she is anti-obama.  But helping get the Jews kicked out of Gaza was one of her goals as Secretary of State.  She accomplished her goal and was quite proud of it.  This is a by-product of her efforts. Click on image to see the full poster.

Rocket Attacks on Israel From Gaza • IDF Blog | The Official Blog of the Israel Defense Forces
Hamas Rocket RangesInfographic by the Israel Defense Forces

Friday, August 24, 2012

U.S. continues to knowingly support terrorists organisations

I've continually posted on facebook that obutta can do what he wants, and no one is going to stop him. If Congress disagrees with him and refuses to pass something, he shuts his office door and signs it into law. Gaza is under Hamas rule. Take a look at this government link that lists all the terrorist organisations in the world: Hamas is number 13. According to US law, "it is unlawful...to knowingly provide 'material support or resources'. It goes on to list what those are, which naturally is money. Obutta isn't the only one to do it. Bush was equally as notorious in his support of hamas. So, why are they doing it? The only reasonable answer I can come up with, is to do away with the Jews. There's no other answer. They know the goal of the arabs. And the US trains, finances, and works to get Israel to surrender her Lands. So what answer do you have for it?http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/other/des/123085.htm


U.S. to continue pouring taxpayers' money into Palestinian coffers

Examiner.com

Members of Hamas pose with a child being groomed to be a suicide bomber. ... The Obama administration is seeking another $200 million to aid the Palestinians in the 2012 fiscal year, State Department officials said on Friday...



Tuesday, August 7, 2012

CNN continues to blame it's listeners for their music bloopers

First it was playing "Stupid Girl" before the short piece on the Palins. Then, they pulled the ultimate in distaste by playing "Only the Good Die Young" after their segment on the Sikh Temple shooting. What was their excuse again? Callers get to choose some of the music played. That's nice. BUT! They know which segment is coming up next. They have control of what's played.I have a really hard time believing any of this was by accident, and here's why - CNN hates Palin. As for the Sikh Temple? Guarantee you, if it had been a mosque - that mistake would have never been made. It was a Sikh Temple, a bunch of Indians (India Indians, not our cassino Indians) - they don't matter. Well, CNN, they do matter, and hopefully this will speed the trend in your already declining ratings.


CNN Plays 'Stupid Girl' To Intro Piece on Sarah Palin

CNN Apologizes For Playing 'Only The Good Die Young' After Segment On ...Huffington Post

Wisconsin temple shooting: CNN plays Only The Good Die Young after segment ...Daily Mail



Thursday, January 19, 2012

Does Newt have anything to gain from Sarah Palin's endorsement?

Rumours have already begun to spread. Will Newt ask Palin to be vice-president? The natural response is insult Palin. Insist she'll wreck any chance he might have of winning.Funny how they're ignoring the very people who originally wanted to hamstring Palin when she said she was thinking about running for president. Now asking her to run. Money is being raised to make a commercial that begs her to runl Why? Because of the choices in the republican club aren't really worth voting for. The whole gang plays in the boys club and can be bribed at the drop of a hat.Palin can't be bribed. So the fight will be fierce to keep her out. I don't think Newt will be able to hold her back if she got in the White House. I'd love to see her get in and jail the lot of them, like what happened in Alaska. That was a classic.


Will Newt Gingrich benefit from Sarah Palin endorsement?

Christian Science Monitor

Sarah Palin Tuesday. In South Carolina Tuesday, Gingrich came out swinging at Mitt Romney. By Shannon McCaffrey, Associated Press / January 18, 2012 Vote for Newt: Former vice presidential candidate and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin addresses a Tea Partly ...

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Ohio – The Land of No Common Sense

It was a rude awakening to find the socialists who had been pushing vote a “no” vote on Issue 2 won.  Was it because they focused their fight on scaring the weak, who believed our entire society would collapse if it passed?  Your house would burn to the ground because we’d have no more firemen?  You would no longer have police protection if Issue 2 passed?

This is the game the socialists played in getting their win against common sense.  In the process, they have once more told those going into the teaching profession, etc and don’t want to be in the union – we don’t want you, go to another state. 

What I have such a hard time understanding is:

1.  What gives the union the right to own businesses and jobs that THEY never started?  In other words, what gives the union the right to tell people you’re not allowed to work here.

2.  What gives people who are lazy the  right to have the same benefits as those who work their butt off?

3.  Why do those who voted “no” against a common sense issue not care about 1 and 2.

Let’s continue my rant.

4.  What makes you think, just because you are a teacher, a cop, a fireman, etc., that you shouldn’t have to chip in on your healthcare and retirement?

Number 4 screams of welfare state.  It also screams of irresponsibility.  It screams “me, me, me generation.”  It' screams that a person shouldn’t have to work to earn their pay.  It screams socialist losers.

I suppose the only bright side to the issue is that at least 25.09% of us have the common sense to know the difference between right and wrong.  We can feel proud that we voted common sense.

The other 74.91% who voted socialist, have disgraced our state.  They are the whiners.  The ones who believe things should be handed to them on a plate without effort.  They are the ones who are exactly what this current Marxist Socialist regime wants – gullible, self-centered followers.

Atlas Shrugs.

 

 

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Cain buckles and falls.

Originally, I had said I would vote for Cain if Palin doesn’t run, but Cain has showed a scary weakness – he apologized for his saying communities have a right to stop mosques from being built where they live.

The muzlims won.  They beat Cain at his own game.  If he apologizes for this, what will they get him to apologize for next? 

“I think he left the meeting with an entirely different view of what Muslims are and what mosques do,” Marro added.

Really?  Because since 9/11, muzlims have carried out 17,536 terror attacks.  Ah, that’s just a bunch of extremists.  Really?  Remember Fort Hood?  That was a “moderate” muzlim. 

When a religion enters this country whose foundation involves turning whatever country it enters into a muzlim country – that “religion” has no right to exist here.  It then becomes a threat to our country.  

Naturally, there are those who say muzlims don’t do that.  Obviously they’re behind on both world history and current events.

This isn’t about freedom of religion folks, it’s about a political agenda disguised as a religion.  Those who say otherwise, are simply lying out of either ignorance or political correctness.

You can read more about Cain buckling under pressure here: Cain buckles.

 

 

Thursday, July 21, 2011

It’s Mock Granny Palin Time

The LSM is out to mock the possibility that Palin’s son got his girlfriend, now wife, pregnant outside of marriage.   These pathetic tactics by the media humour me.  I wish I could put them all in one room and ask:

  1. How many of you were virgins when you got married?
  2. How many of you were using birth control as teens?
  3. How young were you when you lost your virginity?
  4. How many of you got your girlfriend pregnant and then tried to make her have an abortion?
  5. How many of you have illegitimate kids?
  6. How many of you had an abortion?
  7. How many of you have parents who were virgins when they married?
  8. How many of you are the byproduct of said relationships?

I’d like to ask the bloggers, facebook and twitter brats the same questions.  

So!  What are your answers guys?  I’m waiting. 

PS:  Only losers try to hold others to standards they don’t keep themselves – excuses for it,  just make you bigger losers.

 

 

What’s wrong with the truth?

Asked why opening up marriage to gay people would threaten Minnesotans, Bachmann responds: "Schools will then be teaching that homosexuality, or lesbianism, or same-sex marriage, or group marriage, or polygamy is normal, natural and maybe kids should try it."

And she’s right!  As I noted Tuesday, California has ruled that schools in California will begin teaching the history of gay and lesbians.  I’m sure that history won’t go back to the origins of  it being condemned – which is when G-d gave the commandment that it is not allowed.  : )

I can’t help but think when I’m reading articles and posts like this, of the history of civilisations.   The decline of a country can first be seen in it’s art.  After that, you look at how the morality is declining.  Shortly after the decline of morality – the country falls. 

Watch the video here of Bachmann on marriage:  http://tinyurl.com/3qnyvzj